Discuss whether you have situated the work within the broader debates on political violence and IR (e.g., terrorism, genocide, collective violence, etc.)?

Discuss whether you have situated the work within the broader debates on political violence and IR (e.g., terrorism, genocide, collective violence, etc.)?1. the article you’ve chosen to review; 2. why you have chosen it; 3. how the article links to the content of the module (or, indeed, your whole course); 4. what your overall argument will be; 5. and how will it develop (i.e., how will your review be structured).• Main Body (1,000 words): Here you develop the analysis of the article under review, its main concepts, argument(s), evidence and ideas. You’re encouraged to outline 2-3 strengths of the article, before explaining 2-3 of its aspects, which, from your point of view, could be improved or are not fully convincing. Then you would go on to discuss how this relates to the broader subject of political violence, exploring either the ways in which different academics have already made claims about the topic in relation to this material, or the ways in which this subject has implications for more general arguments about Political Violence and Terror (this can be informed by 2-5 other sources; i.e., books or articles). • Conclusion (less than 250 word): summarise what you have argued and why. Here you will state what your review has shown, how it relates to the important debate about political violence that you have identified. Don’t add anything new here.• Reference list (2-5): this is not a bibliography; it is a list of the sources that you cite in the text. Everything on this list should be cited in the text, and everything cited in the text should be on this list. List your sources alphabetically by the last name of the first author, in the Harvard style:• Example: Author, A.N. (1990) Book Title. Place: Publisher. 1. Have you clearly analysed the content of the article (main argument, concepts, ideas, theories, findings, etc.)?2. What are its strengths? What are its weaknesses? (your argument)3. Have you situated the work within the broader debates on political violence and IR (e.g., terrorism, genocide, collective violence, etc.)?4. Have your sources been properly referenced?5. Have you proofread/edited your review (you can use the ‘Review function’ of Word or Grammarly)?