Why is the MCDC considered controversial while the articles discussing the sanctuary movement are not? How do these groups help or do not help with the notion of border security along the U.S.-Mexico border?

Answer the question according to the articles provided. Each question is includes the authors name from each article where you can find the answer. There are 4 questions, each answer must be 250 words more.1)Cunningham (1998) states, “…they (sanctuary members) established decision-making procedures for determining who was a “real” refugee…” (pg. 380). What is the risk, if any, in this process for the sanctuary members, those who seek refuge, and the public? Please explain your answer.2)What surprised you the most of the Lorber (2013) article when compared to the Cunningham (1998) article? Why did it surprise you?3)Cunningham (1998) states, faith based activists made their decisions to assist Central Americans base on the idea they were acting on their conscience. How does this differ from the descriptions made by Doty (2007) regarding Civilian Border Patrols? Do both categories of groups feel passionate about their beliefs? How does this impact crime and border security (think of the border security eco-system)?4)According to Yoxall (2006) claims the “Minutemen Civil Defense Corps (MCDC) represents a controversial development in the role of citizen activism on the United States – Mexico border” (pg. 521). Why is the MCDC considered controversial while the articles discussing the sanctuary movement are not? How do these groups help or do not help with the notion of border security along the U.S.-Mexico border?