Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed.
Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed.
May 7, 2020 Comments Off on Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed. Uncategorized Assignment-helpConduct research from scholarly sources on each side of your issue and write a paper that includes the following:•Introduction (approximately 100 words)oExplain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing.•Presentation of an ArgumentoDescribe the scholarly source on one side of the issue.Summarize the key points made. (approximately 100 words)oPresent what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words)oEvaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source.You may address questions such as how adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion. •Presentation of an Opposing ArgumentoDescribe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue.Summarize the key points made. oPresent what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words)oEvaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source.You may address questions such as how adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion.•Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources oDiscuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed (Scholarly and Popular Resources (1) (Links to an external site.)).Some specific types of questions you might address here include: Who is the target audience? What types of motives may be influencing these authors? Discuss any logical fallacies in any of the sources.