Who is this book primarily aimed at, the professional historian or a more general reading audience?
These are the kinds of aspects you should address:A brief overview of the book’s biographical figure and their major contribution/impact on early American history.Did the book offer a balanced account, or was it seemingly biased (either in favor or against)?Did the book use the kind of sources that demonstrate strong academic quality and reliability?Who is this book primarily aimed at, the professional historian or a more general reading audience?Did the book offer adequate general context for the biographical figure in question?What unexpected, unique, or otherwise interesting things did you learn from this book?
