Analyze the following in terms of fallacies in causal reasoning.

1. Analyze the following in terms of fallacies in causal reasoning. For example: Do you think there are any fallacies being committed here in terms of causal reasoning? Why or why not? If there’s indeed a mistake in causal reasoning here, explain which one and how you come to this conclusion. …[T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing of unborn human life. It continues on to affect our attitude toward all aspects of human life. This is most obvious in how quickly, following the acceptance of abortion, comes the acceptance of infanticide―the killing of babies who after birth do not come up to someone’s standard of life worthy to be lived―and then on to euthanasia of the aged. If human life can be taken before birth, there is no logical reason why human life cannot be taken after birth.2. Assignment: Argument from RhetoricClick here to read News Clip 3 or visit the News Clip Section. Can you detect rhetoric or fallacies being used instead of an argument? Can you detect rhetoric or fallacies being used to support an argument? Can twitter posts serve to do this? Can images do this? Two examples would suffice. Explain your choices based on what you have learned so far. 3. Read the news clip #2 and analyze the story. Answer the following:1. Explain if the writing is clear or if it lacks clarity.2. Explain if all of the information is credible.4. Watch the video clip(11 ridiculous moments from keeping up with the Kardashians) from a famous reality TV show and answer the following: 1. How does reality TV persuade its audience? 2. What does ” exploitation ” and “ destruction ” of lives mean for reality TV ratings? 3. How do you think this kind of TV affects young people today? 5. This will be based on the movie “Snowpiercer” After you watched the movie choose one of the following questions and write freely on the response: 1. How close or distant from our reality is the depiction of reality in this movie? Why?2. How do cause, effect, and justification intertwine in important decision-making?6. Read the essay on Crime and Punishment: “Enhanced Punishment,” Discuss whether you can detect any fallacious statement, any appeal to emotion, any use of rhetoric. Explain why you come to this conclusion. Also, discuss whether you agree or disagree with the author’s central argument. 7. Look at this famous video clip from Key and Peele( Dueling Hats) and discuss the following1. What do you think they are trying to demonstrate with this sketch?2. What famous myth/fallacy are they debulking?4. As a critical thinker, what can you do with this information?8. Watch the second presidential debate of 2016. You don’t have to watch it all. Just enough to spot one ad hominem fallacy or two. Tell us which ad hominem fallacy you spot and why you think it is one. Tell us also if you think the use of this fallacy strengthen or weakened an argument or the claim.9. Snowpiercer is an R-rated film. If this is not a choice for you, an alternative dystopian film, G-rated, is WALL-E. You can then choose to watch WALL-E and follow the same discussion. Please watch and enjoy. Then, comment on the following:1. How is it that the earth becomes so messed up like that?2. What is the justification that in order to survive you have to have essentially an enslaved class?3. What is the justification for the spread of fear?3. How close or distant from our reality is the depiction of reality in this movie? Why?4. How do cause, effect, and justification intertwine in important decision-making?10.You will make a decision concerning a highly charged, imaginary situation. The situation is as follows: “You are a surgeon at a large hospital. Your committee must make a very important decision. Seven patients need a heart transplant. There is only one heart donor at this time. All of the patients are eligible to receive this heart. All are physically able. And all have compatible tissue and blood typing. Which patient would you choose to receive the heart? Why?An important note: most recipients of organ transplants are now managed by a nationwide network, which removes some of this decision-making pressure from the surgeons. Also, patients who do not receive this heart will not automatically die. Some (not all) will probably survive until another donor is available.)Patient Waiting List• 31 year old male; African American, brain surgeon at the height of his career; no children• 12 year old female; Vietnamese; accomplished violinist; blind• 40 year old male; Hispanic, teacher, 2 children• 15 year old female; White, unmarried, 6 months pregnant• 35 year old male; Hispanic; Roman Catholic priest• 17 year old female; White; waitress; high school dropout; supports/cares for a brother who is severely disabled• 38 year old female; White; AIDS researcher; no children; lesbianTo consider in your discussion:1. What was your decision?2. How did you arrive at your decision?3. What decision-making method did you use (consensus, voting, etc.)?4. How was your decision influenced by your values? Attitudes? Prejudices?