hat type of law is the Endangered Species Act of 1973?

hat type of law is the Endangered Species Act of 1973?
May 20, 2020 Comments Off on hat type of law is the Endangered Species Act of 1973? Uncategorized Assignment-help
Words: 1078
Pages: 4
Subject: Uncategorized

Module 2 VideoVideo 2.1 (State Law) https://youtu.be/gP7rtDX_9UkQuestionsVideo 2.2 (State Law) https://youtu.be/e_jkfnEZQPYVideo 2.3 (Federal Law) https://youtu.be/DlH2q1AVjB4Video 2.4 (Federal Law) https://youtu.be/nMbienvBYPkVideo 2.5 (Federal Law) https://youtu.be/ftjLUyzEUi0Video 2.6 (Federal Law) https://youtu.be/CbD7-lvM0GEVideo 2.7 (International Law) https://youtu.be/zg5CO75S8l4Video 2.8 (Legal Interpretation) https://youtu.be/aEox4pMXpvMVideo 2.9 (Legal Interpretation) https://youtu.be/tWbMzgDpzssVideo 2.10 (Wrapping Up) https://youtu.be/J8km-Qj6xj41. In one of the videos in Module 2(Video2.1-2.10), the Professor accidentally knocks the camera off its tripod and then acts as nothing has happened. In which video does Professor’s camera fall down?(a)This is a trick question, as the Professor is an expert cameraman and never dropped the camera in any of his videos.(b)Video 2.2 on State Law(c)Video 2.7 on International Law(d)Video 2.6 on Federal Law(e)Video 2.8 on Legal Interpretation2. In which case in Module 2 is the vagueness doctrine discussed?(a)This is a trick question, as the vagueness doctrine was not discussed in any of the cases in Module 2.(b)Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife(c)Big Cat Rescue, Inc. v. Big Cat Rescue Entertainment(d)Wilkerson v. Florida(e)Yates v. United States3. Module 2 is designed to introduce you to the three main sources of law in our country: (1) State law, (2) federal law, and (3) international law. What type of law is the Endangered Species Act of 1973?(a)Federal law(b)Private international law(c)The common law(d)State law(e)Public international law4. Among other things, Module 2 contains the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. This historic international treaty created the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 1946, a global body that is supposed to promote the conservation of whales. When did the United States join the IWC?(a)This is a trick question, as the United States has refused to join the IWC.(b)1948 (two years after the IWC was created).(c)1973 (the year the Endangered Species Act was enacted by the Congress).(d)1946 (the same year the IWC was created).(e)1980 (President Jimmy Carter’s last full year in office).5. Among other things, Module 2 contains a State statute that makes it a crime to commit animal cruelty in the State of Florida. In what case in Module 2 was the constitutionality of this Florida law brought into question?(a)This is a trick, as the constitutionality of this law has not yet been challenged in court.(b)Wilkerson v. Florida(c)Yates v. US(d)Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife(e)State v. Jackson6. Is the crime of animal cruelty classified as a felony or a misdemeanor under Florida law?(a)A felony of the third degree.(b)Both, depending on whether the act was intentional or not.(c)A felony of the first degree.(d)A misdemeanor of the first degree.(e)Neither, as animal cruelty is considered a “regulatory” crime.7. In which video does the Professor mention that he had the great honor of meeting Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBG)?(a)Video 2.3 on State Law(b)Video 2.9 on Legal Interpretation(c)Video 2.7 on International Law(d)This is a trick question, as the Professor has never had the honor of meeting RBG in person.(e)Video 2.4 on Federal Law8. According to the landmark case of Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, a plaintiff must have “standing” in order to bring a lawsuit. Which of the following statements best summarizes the legal meaning of the “standing” requirement?(a)This is a trick question, as the Lujan case overruled the “standing” requirement.(b)Broadly speaking, “standing” means that both the plaintiff (the party bringing the lawsuit) and the defendant (the party being sued) must have a personal stake in the outcome of the case.(c)Broadly speaking, “standing” means that the defendant (the party being sued) must have a personal stake in the outcome of the case.(d)Broadly speaking, “standing” refers to the type of court (State, court, or international) in which the lawsuit is brought.(e)Broadly speaking, “standing” means that the plaintiff (the party bringing the lawsuit) must have a personal stake in the outcome of the case.9. What is one of the “theme songs” for Week 2 of this course?(a)Here Kitty Kitty by Joe Exotic.(b)Welcome to the Jungle by Guns N’Roses.(c)Doja Cat Remix (Clean).(d)Eye of the Tiger by Survivor.(e)This is a trick question, as this course does not have any theme songs.10. What was the main legal issue in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife?(a)Whether a private group (Defenders of Wildlife) had legal “standing” to sue under international law..(b)Whether a private group (Defenders of Wildlife) had legal “standing” to sue under State law.(c)Whether a private group (Defenders of Wildlife) had legal “standing” to sue under federal law.(d)Whether the Government has standing to sue a private group (Defenders of Wildlife).11. Check out Joe Exotic’s mugshot (pictured below) as well as the actual criminal indictment against him here (Links to an external site.). What type of law is he accused of breaking? (State law, federal law, or international law?)(a)Murder-for-hire under federal law.(b)Murder-for-hire under Florida law.(c)Murder-for-hire under Oklahoma law.(d)This is a trick question, as Joe Exotic was charged with mail and wire fraud, not murder-for-hire.(e)Murder-for-hire under international anti-terrorism laws.12. Yates v. US was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in 2015. What was the main legal issue in this particular case?(a)Whether a commercial fisherman (Yates) could be charged with destruction of evidence under federal law (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) for throwing an illegally-caught fish overboard.(b)This is a trick question, as Yates was not charged with a crime; he was the person in charge of the US Fish & Wildlife Service.(c)Whether a commercial fisherman (Yates) could be charged under federal law (the Endangered Species Act of 1973) for throwing an illegally-caught fish overboard.(d)Whether a commercial fisherman (Yates) could be charged under international law (the International Convention for Regulation of Whaling) for throwing an illegally-caught fish overboard.(e)Whether a commercial fisherman (Yates) could be charged under State law (Florida animal cruelty statute) for throwing an illegally-caught fish overboard.13. True or False? The Big Cat Public Safety Act was enacted by the Congress and signed into law by President Donald J. Trump last month.