Discuss how much insight you think these approaches provide into your character’s personality.

Elizabeth Bennet from Pride and Prejudice, Astrid Leong from Crazy Rich Asians, Daenerys Targaryen from Game of Thrones. This assignment has you take on the role of a researcher to analyze this character’s personality using the approaches used by personality scientists in the study of human psychology. I expect you to incorporate information from class lecture, your textbook, class discussions and readings, and your reflection papers in your analysis. You may also decide to include outside sources to support your analysis if needed.Your reading audience is an intelligent adult who has taken Introduction to Psychology, and though very interested in personality psychology, does not have much background otherwise.Your paper should include the following sections:Section 1 (5 pts): Brief introduction to the focus of your analysis. Who is this character? What book/show/movie are they from? You may want to include a brief historical perspective to this character. Include a thesis statement about the theories/constructs you will use to explain their personality.Sections 2-4 (20 pts each): For THREE of the five approaches, you will:Define the approach more broadly. What kinds of questions does this approach answer? What are its methods and measurements? How is it different from the other approaches or what makes it unique?Focus on one theory or construct in particular within that approach. Define the theory/construct, discussing how it manifests in people’s lives, citing literature discussed in lecture or your textbook. Remember that your audience isn’t familiar with these topics. Describe in detail the overarching personality theory AND specific concept/construct that you believe best describes this character. The idea is to show me that you have a good understanding of the theory and specific concepts by describing them IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Papers that use direct textbook quotations or quotations from lecture are NOT demonstrating good understanding of the theory/concept and will lose points. Apply the theory to your character. How does your character exemplify it? What evidence do you have for it? Convince the reader that your target is a prime example of the theory/construct by providing evidence of how your target manifests that personality construct. Elaborate on how the evidence you’ve presented illustrates the construct you have identified. You can use any form of S, I, B, or L data to illustrate something about your character’s personality. You should be able to provide at least 2 examples demonstrating the construct. You can use any two forms for each approach (e.g., S and B, S and L, B and I, S and S, etc.), no need to be consistent, and you are welcome to use more than 2 kinds for any approach.****As an example, for the Psychoanalytic approach, you might focus on Attachment theory and then specifically avoidant style. You might discuss B data from a particular scene where the character is showing avoidant tendencies (explain these behaviors in detail), as well use I data where another character is describing this character’s avoidant details (again explain specifically what is described).****Section 5 (15 pts): You will now critically analyze the data you have reported for each of the approaches as a whole.Discuss how much insight you think these approaches provide into your character’s personality. Include at least one strength and one weakness of each approach. Indicate which approach you think is most useful for understanding your character and explain why. Indicate which approach you think is least useful for understanding your character and explain why. Provide an example of an important part of your character’s personality that cannot be addressed well by the approaches/constructs you chose. Is there another construct/theory that does capture that part of your target? Explain.Section 6 (5 pts): Brief conclusion paragraph that ties the paper together effectively by reviewing the approaches and theories you used to explain your personality.Writing Quality (10 pts): Points off for spelling/grammar/punctuation errors, poor clarity/structure, or poor presentation of ideas. Format (5 pts): 6-8 pages plus properly cited references page; 12-point font; double-spaced; 1-inch margins; headings for each section; professional tone throughout.