Compare the inconsistencies or contradictions of ethical decisions (CO4).

This module outcomes addressed in this activity are:•Explain the rightness or wrongness of lying (CO5);•Compare the inconsistencies or contradictions of ethical decisions (CO4); and•Identify unconsidered arguments that might alter your judgments to make difficult ethical choices (CO4, 5).Questions:Based on the readings and activities for this module, answer the following questions:•After reading the mini-cases and the Helms’ case, discuss your responses to the ethical hypotheticals on page 10 of the mini-cases. Why did you vote as you did?•How would you compare the way in which ethical decisions were made in the cases? Do you see any inconsistencies or contradictions in these ethical decisions?•Address the Dobel chapter and his concept of “political prudence.” How would you use this concept to alter your original judgments on the mini-cases and the Helms’ case? Explain your answer.