Have the trade tensions between the US and China made it more beneficial to the environment to stop recycling paper products altogether?

Have the trade tensions between the US and China made it more beneficial to the environment to stop recycling paper products altogether?
May 26, 2020 Comments Off on Have the trade tensions between the US and China made it more beneficial to the environment to stop recycling paper products altogether? Uncategorized Assignment-help
Words: 19
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Based on your research and the feedback you received on your proposal, write a 3-4 page paper, not including references (12 point font, 1 inch margins, double spaced, Calibri font, using Word software, APA format for citations) in which you answer your question. Incorporate data/evidence to help support your answer and apply what you have learned about ecosystems and human interactions in this class to analyze how the natural world is affected by the conclusions you came to. There are two example papers posted in D2L for you to view. Please do not use the same topics for your paper as used in the example papers. Use at least TWO sources from peer-reviewed literature and 5 sources total. Include data. For example, how many pounds of carbon dioxide are emitted in a year of driving a 2000 Honda Civic compared to the new Toyota Prius? Use the data you found in your research to determine the answer to your question. Avoid use of vague words/terms: eco, ecology, environmentally friendly. Avoid writing in question format (with the exception of your inquiry question). Write using formal, academic vocabulary and tone. Write using 3rd person. Review the assignment rubric to be sure you are meeting the assignment requirements. When editing your paper, pay attention not only to content, but to grammar, spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and word choice. Use the peer review guidelines (#4 below) to be sure your own assignment is ready to be submitted. Organize your paper in the same way a peer-reviewed journal article is reviewed (however, you do not need to write an abstract). Title Try to come up with a short declarative sentence that contains some key words and your key conclusion. Your inquiry question is not sufficient as a title. For example: -Not title: Would it be better for the environment to buy a new Toyota Prius or a 2000 Honda Civic? -Title: Purchasing a 2000 Honda Civic has less impact on water use and carbon dioxide emissions than purchasing a new Toyota Prius. (Obviously your title will be dependent on your topic and your findings). Introduction Give background knowledge about the topic being studied. What is your inquiry question? What brought you to this question? Give the context for the question. Why is it important or interesting to study? Which environmental impacts were important for you to examine? What aspects of your question might have environmental impacts that you need to research? Methods Where did you gather data for your search? What databases did you use to do your search? Which search terms did you use to do your search? What specific data/evidence did you need to find in order to make an evidence-based decision? Results Describe your findings. Include any data you found in your research here. If a graph would help describe your findings, include it in this section. Conclusion Summarize your findings. Answer your inquiry question here. What data led you to this conclusion and why? References Please use APA format. Reference the Purdue OWL APA website as needed. Hello, I have already chosen a topic and received the okay to continue the paper. My topic is: •Have the trade tensions between the US and China made it more beneficial to the environment to stop recycling paper products altogether? Some key points the professor and I discussed I should include are: •Waste from making raw materials o What benefits and costs of new container rather than processing recycled material •How is new material made o At what environmental costs •Air pollution of both •Water pollution of both •Energy requirements of both