What ethical obstacles affect how the medical community addresses Gestational Diabetes?

Compose a focused paper that explains and describes your healthcare issue or topic from a cultural and ethical perspective of inquiry. (You will cover two perspectives in one paper.)Form and answer two levels of research questions for each inquiry to address your chosen topic.Choose a “Level 1 Research Question/Writing Prompt” from both of the lists below to answer in the paper.Compose a “Level 2 Research Question/Writing Prompt” for each kind of inquiry that provides detail, specificity, and focus to your inquiry, research, and writing.State your research questions in your paper’s introduction.Form the body of your paper by answering each research question and support your assertions with evidence (research).In the conclusion of the paper, briefly review the issues, research questions, answers, and insights.Level 1 Research Questions/Writing PromptsETHICAL Perspective of InquiryWhat laws govern or pertain to the issue?What ethical obstacles affect how the medical community addresses the issue?How do ethical theories apply to the issue?How do money, power, and control matters relate to the issue and its treatment?Level 1 Research Questions/Writing PromptsCULTURAL Perspective of InquiryWhich cultural values and/or norms influence the issue?How is the issue addressed differently in varying cultural contexts and situations?Which cultures or societies are most affected by the issue? Why?Which cultural traditions affect the treatment(s)?Your paper must be five pages in length and reference four to six scholarly, peer-reviewed resources. Be sure to follow current APA Style formatting standards (spacing, font, headers, titles, abstracts, page numbering, etc.).RubricContent–Levels of Achievement:Sophisticated 27 (27.00%) – 30 (30.00%)The writer demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic. He/she presents a clear, focused central idea (thesis) and supports it effectively with concrete details and examples. Other authors’ ideas are skillfully paraphrased. Direct quotations are minimal and well-chosen. All sources are relevant and appropriate, and the writer succinctly and elegantly synthesizes the scholarship on the topic.Highly Competent 24 (24.00%) – 26.7 (26.70%)The writer demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic. He/she presents and supports a clear and focused central idea (thesis). Supporting details are relevant but may lack depth. Other authors’ ideas are effectively paraphrased, and direct quotations are minimal. All sources are relevant and appropriate, and the writer effectively synthesizes the scholarship on the topic.Fairly Competent 21.9 (21.90%) – 23.7 (23.70%)The writer demonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic. He/she presents a central idea (thesis), but it may be overly general/broad. He/she adequately supports the central idea, but supporting details may at times be vague. The writer makes an effort to paraphrase but at times struggles to express ideas in his/her own words. The essay lacks interesting details, and/or not all sources are relevant and appropriate.Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 21.6 (21.60%)The writer does not demonstrate an adequate understanding of the topic. The central idea (thesis) is unclear or missing, and the essay lacks focus. Supporting details are insufficient and/or not relevant. Attempts to paraphrase do not always reflect understanding. The writer has not used enough sources, and/or the sources are not all relevant and appropriate.Organization–Levels of Achievement:Sophisticated 18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%)The writer demonstrates a clear sense of direction. The paper includes an engaging introduction and conclusion. Paragraphs are unified and arranged in a logical order. Each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea of that paragraph. The writer smoothly transitions from paragraph to paragraph, showing connections between related ideas. Supporting details within paragraphs are well-organized, and research is well-integrated.Highly Competent 16 (16.00%) – 17.8 (17.80%)The writer demonstrates a sense of direction. The paper includes as strong introduction and conclusion. Paragraphs are unified and include topic sentences, but they may lack smooth transitions between ideas. The organization of supporting details within paragraphs may need improvement.Fairly Competent 14.6 (14.60%) – 15.8 (15.80%)The writer demonstrates some direction and includes an adequate introduction and conclusion, but topic sentences and transitions are weak. The paragraphs show unity, but they are not arranged in any discernable order, and supporting details may not always be well-organized.Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 14.4 (14.40%)The writer demonstrates little or no direction. The introduction and conclusion are weak. It is difficult to identify a single subtopic for each paragraph because paragraphs are not unified and lack clear topic sentences or transitions. The order of body paragraphs seems random, as do the supporting details within them.Style/Language–Levels of Achievement:Sophisticated 18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%)The writer’s tone is confident, engaging, and appropriate for the assignment and/or the intended audience. The text demonstrates strong vocabulary skills and does not suffer from errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas concisely, only using as many words as necessary to communicate a point. The writer achieves flow and readability by employing sentence variety successfully.Highly Competent 16 (16.00%) – 17.8 (17.80%)The writer’s tone is appropriate and effective overall. The text demonstrates good use of vocabulary and contains few (if any) errors in word choice. The writer expresses ideas concisely and clearly most of the time. The writer makes an effort to employ sentence variety.Fairly Competent 14.6 (14.60%) – 15.8 (15.80%)The writer’s tone suffers from one or more possible problems. Depending on the assignment, it may be too informal, too personal, not authoritative enough, etc. Numerous sentences suffer from lack of variety, awkward constructions, wordiness, limited vocabulary, and/or errors in word choice.Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 14.4 (14.40%)The writer often fails to communicate ideas effectively because the paper suffers from significant problems with tone, language use, and/or wordiness.Sentence Structure and Mechanics–Levels of Achievement:Sophisticated 18 (18.00%) – 20 (20.00%)The writer makes minimal (if any) errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. There are no fragments or run-on sentences.Highly Competent 16 (16.00%) – 17.8 (17.80%)The writer makes some errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation, but these errors do not significantly distract the reader from the substance of the text. The paper contains few (if any) fragments and/or run-on sentences.Fairly Competent 14.6 (14.60%) – 15.8 (15.80%)The writer makes numerous errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure, which at times distract the reader from the substance of the text.Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 14.4 (14.40%)The writer makes a significant number of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, and/or sentence structure, regularly distracting the reader from the substance of the text and hindering comprehension.