Compare Watson and Arneson’s arguments. Are they consistently applying consequentialist or deontological moral reasoning?

1.Compare Watson and Arneson’s arguments. Are they consistently applying consequentialist or deontological moral reasoning? Given what you read in this and previous modules, which moral principle should we apply in this case? https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/ethics-in-human-experimentation-in-science-based-medicine/https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htmhttps://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.htmlhttps://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-introductionhttps://ori.hhs.gov/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-nuremberg-code-directives-human-experimentationhttps://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-IRBshttps://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-Continuing-responsibilityhttps://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-Ethical-issues