Describe what we know about the plants’ morphology, their geographic distribution, and their soil preferences, as well as the regional geology and other physical evidence from the Johnson mine and the archeological site (in other words, all the non-genetic evidence put forth in this case).

1) Discuss the physical evidence in this case. Describe what we know about the plants’ morphology, their geographic distribution, and their soil preferences, as well as the regional geology and other physical evidence from the Johnson mine and the archeological site (in other words, all the non-genetic evidence put forth in this case). Be sure to refer to the rubric below to make sure you’ve covered all of the important evidence! Based on this evidence alone, would you conclude that Pete Anderson is guilty or not guilty? Explain why. 2) Name the molecular-based method used by scientists to distinguish between the different species of daisy, given that these plants look very similar. In your own words, describe how this method works, based on your reading and lectures from this module. 3) What information did the scientists involved in this case learn from using this method? What were the results from this method that allowed them to distinguish between the plants? 4) Considering both the molecular evidence from this case (from question #3) and the physical evidence (from question #1), would you conclude that Pete Anderson is guilty or not guilty? Explain why. Has considering the molecular evidence changed the verdict you gave in question 1? Why or why not?