How do you judge the trustworthiness of educational experts (see Willingham, 2012) and the rigor of research methods (see Slavin, 2019)?

1. What did you find most useful/helpful from the readings?2. What did you find most surprising/concerning from the readings?3. Given the evidence, will your practice change? And if so, how?4. Is technology a distraction when thinking about these techniques?5. How might technology support these techniques? Do we need technology at all?6. What other educational myths/misconceptions are you aware of (i.e., we only use 10% of our bran — see Lilienfeld, Lynn, Ruscio, & Beyerstein, 2009).7. How do you judge the trustworthiness of educational experts (see Willingham, 2012) and the rigor of research methods (see Slavin, 2019)?8. Did you see themes across techniques that worked well?9. Did you see themes across techniques that do not work well?10. How does the following article relate to the readings? https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2019/willingham