In your own words, please explain the flaws you have found in the article you selected.

Post the link to and brief analyses of published articles. These will be articles that the student sponsor thinks are logically flawed in some significant way. The articles may be lacking in use of appeals to ethos, pathos, or logos. These articles do not have to come from the databases but can be found anywhere. Indeed, because so much of the open internet consists of illogical rants and fake news articles, finding logically flawed material there should be easy. Open up the internet and throw a dart at it. The chances are great that you will hit something that is illogical, has been posted by someone without any credentials in the field in question, or is meant just to get a knee-jerk emotional reaction from people rather than presenting a logical argument.In your own words, please explain the flaws you have found in the article you selected. Make sure you name them by using the terminology from the PowerPoint and from the logical fallacies list I have provided. (See attached)Please post the link to the article above your discussion. Mention at least six specific fallacies and where they occur in the article.