Do you believe that the Maryland Court of Appeals was correct in their decision to overturn the two murder convictions based on their summation that the Judge erred by asking the jurors if they could “convict a defendant without scientific evidence”.

(1) Do you believe that Judges, Prosecutors and/or Defense Attorneys should be allowed to question prospective jurors during the voir dire process regarding their television viewing habits with regard to television shows similar to CSI, Law & Order, and/or Forensic Files, and if watching these types of shows would have an effect on their decision making process during deliberations?(2) Do you believe that people who watch these types of shows are more inclined to expect physical evidence to be presented at trial and/or are more likely to acquit a defendant if physical evidence is not presented?(3) Do you believe that the Maryland Court of Appeals was correct in their decision to overturn the two murder convictions based on their summation that the Judge erred by asking the jurors if they could “convict a defendant without scientific evidence”. Explain why you agree or disagree.