Define “justice” and “rights” from a biblical perspective.

Research Paper In modern times, there is significant discussion about “justice” and “rights.” We often hear that something does or does not achieve “justice” or that someone has a “right” to something. Please address the following issues in your paper. 1.Define “justice” and “rights” from a biblical perspective. This should set a standard by which claims to justice and rights can be analyzed.2.Select a specific, contemporary legal issue in the United States where individuals assert a “right” to something or state that something is inconsistent with standards of “justice” and apply a biblical understanding of “justice” and “rights” to conclude whether the specific asserted right or claim of injustice you selected is indeed a denial of a “right” or fails to achieve “justice.” Be sure to fully explain each part of your answer.Be sure to use materials from the reading, the Bible, and outside sources. Research Purpose/ Rubric40.25 to 43.75 points:The legal issues are clearly identified and retain focus throughout the paper. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points. All necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable. Organization emphasizes the central theme or purpose. Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are fully addressed/incorporated.36.75 to 40 points:The legal issues may require some clarification and/or greater prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may not provide adequate background on the topic and preview major points. Most necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable and sufficiently addressed. Organization may not sufficiently emphasize the central theme or purpose. Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are generally addressed/ incorporated.1 to 36.5: pointsThe legal issues require significant clarification and prominence throughout the paper. Introduction may be missing or ambiguous. Some necessary aspects of the assignment described in the instructions are clearly identifiable, but others may require clarification or development. Organization may require significant improvement. Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.0 Points:Not presentReasoned Analysis98.25 to 106.75 points:Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning. Objective, reasoned analysis is employed. Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated. Conclusion reached is logically derived from the essay’s content. An authoritative, persuasive, and statesmanlike voice is used (first/second person perspective avoided). Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are fully addressed/incorporated.89.5 to 98 points:Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support. Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation. Conclusion reaches may not be logically derived from the essay’s content. Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required. Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are generally addressed/ incorporated.1 to 89.25 points:Major points require significant clarification and scholarly support. Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed. The conclusion reached is not logically derived from the essay’s content. Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required. Lessons from applicable modules/weeks are insufficiently addressed/incorporated.0 Points:Not presentScholarly Support22.5 to 24.5 points:At least 10 references from 5 separate scholarly sources reflecting diverse viewpoints and germane research are employed. Source material is properly attributed.20.5 to 22.25 points:Some improvements/additions to quality/quantity of sources are needed. Clarification of source material may be needed.1 to 20 points:Significant improvement of scholarly support is needed. Source material may not be properly attributed.0 pointsNot presentStructure (30%)Advanced 92-100%Proficient 84-91%Developing 1-83%Not presentTotalComposition and Readability29 to 31.5 points:Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed and spelling is correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown. Sentences are well constructed, with consistently strong and varied structure. Sentence transitions are present and direct the flow of thought. Paragraph transitions are present and logical, directing flow of thought throughout the paper. The paper uses professional tone and language.26.5 to 28.5 points:Paper contains minimal errors in grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. Sentences are generally complete, clear, and concise. Rhetorical skill is shown, although a few points may require clarification. Some variation in sentence structure or transitions may be required to improve flow of discussion. Some paragraph transitions may require improvement. Some improvement is needed on professional tone and language.1 to 26 points:Paper contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, punctuation and spelling. Multiple sentences may be incomplete or ambiguously worded. Sentence transitions may be weak, insufficiently directing the flow of thought. Significant improvement is needed on professional tone and language.0 Points:Not presentFormatting29 to 31.5 points:Paper is laid out effectively and uses reader-friendly aids (e.g., section subheadings, table of contents, indices, appendices, etc.) as appropriate.