Compare and contrast your selection with the Boudreau and Lupia piece.

Arguably one of the more provocative pieces we have read up to this point in the semester was Cheryl Boudreau and Arthur Lupia’s piece on political knowledge. As you should know the authors take aim at the common assumption that people are political uninformed about political issues. I would like you to discuss at least two reasons why the authors argued that the existing literature on political knowledge is incorrect. Once you have done that I would like you to try and connect this piece with one of the other readings/videos that we have had during this section of the class. You can pick whatever selection that you want but make sure that you compare and contrast your selection with the Boudreau and Lupia piece.