Write a persuasive esssay about Should freedom of religion be allowed at catholic university?

To begin:

Consider the two short articles about freedom of religious expression, in Oklahoma and in the European Union. As you review these two accounts, what similarities and differences do you notice in the definitions of religious freedom, in the specific kinds of laws that are being made, in the description of people’s experience of freedom/legal restrictions, and in your own reaction to the two scenarios described?

Next:

When you have collected a good amount of evidence from the reading, including specific quotations and ideas that caught your attention, select some of this evidence to make an argument FOR or AGAINST the following statement:

Based on the two articles, total freedom of religious expression should be allowed at St. Mary’s University.

This position paper is asking you to consider the rights of individuals and communities, and to think about general freedoms within a particular kind of setting.

Finally:

After you have taken a position for or against the statement above, write a paper defending your position. Your paper should begin right away with a claim. It can be stated as simply as this at the top of the page: “Based on [type of evidence] in the two articles, total freedom of religious expression should/should not be allowed at St. Mary’s University.”

Organize your evidence in whatever way seems to make the most convincing case. Write in complete sentences and break paragraphs where appropriate (each paragraph should make a point and back that point up with evidence). Use specific examples to explain what, if any, limitations should be placed on religious expression and why, or to explain why limitations are unnecessary/harmful/problematic.

The uploads would be the sources
The news paper and Ten Commandments
You can paraphrase or use direct quotations from the text, but please indicate which article you’re citing in parentheses in the text (Ten Commandments).