Why do you think Haraway claims “Dog writing is a branch of feminist theory”?
Write a response to at least 2 or the following 3 citations from Haraway’s Companion Species Manifesto:
Why do you think Haraway claims “Dog writing is a branch of feminist theory”? (Page 3)
“Dogs are a fleshly material-semiotic presences in the body of techno-sciences.” (Page 5)
”Dogs are about the inescapable, contradictory story of relationships” (page 12)
An alternative prompt to respond to: Why does Haraway mash up “nature” and “culture” into one term: “natureculture” (on p.3, but see also p.4 and p.8 and our class session recording)?
