Why is the adversary system of law a necessity to produce just results?

Discussion Prompts (choose one):1- When has the line been crossed between a public trial at which the media are present and a “trial by media”? Could this problem ever justify barring the media from attending trials? Do the media ever have that much influence on the public or jurors?2-Why is the adversary system of law a necessity to produce just results?3-Why would people want to represent themselves in court pro se? Would you think more or less of those representing themselves? Why?