According to Strawson, “realistic materialists” need to recognise that physics cannot provide a complete account of reality as it fundamentally is. Explain his argument for this view.

According to Strawson, “realistic materialists” need to recognise that physics cannot provide a complete account of reality as it fundamentally is. Explain his argument for this view. Is this a coherent position? Is the label”materialism” appropriate for it? How does this version of “materialism” compare with other understandings of materialism, such as Montero’s?Positive leaning towards pansychism with appropriate critiscism of Strawson