Describe Descartes and Panikkar.

Based on his discussion in Meditation III (drawing on the first two meditations as well if necessary), reconstruct, in broad strokes, Descartes’ argument for God’s existence. In the process, explain Descartes’ notion of God, the general nature of the idea of God/infinity, and what roles these play in the argument. Finally, based on his discussion in “Nine Ways not to Talk about God”, how might Panikkar respond to Descartes’ treatment of God/infinity?. http://www.aril.org/panikkar.htm (Link for “Nine ways not to talk about God”). Grading Criteria:. [Listed Roughly in order of importance, with ‘Relevance’ being the umbrella under which the other factors are understood.]. Relevance: Did you properly and fully address the prompt questions as they were asked?. Completeness/thoroughness: Did you answer every part of the question, explaining in your own words all the important key points of the content along the way?. Evidence (textual) provided: Did you make a solid case for your interpretation of the text by citing evidence in support of your specific claims about the author’s ideas?. Clarity/Precision of Expression: Did you write clearly, make your thoughts as transparent as possible to the reader, and choose words that aptly described what you meant to say? Did you include the material that is necessary in order to directly and completely respond to the question, avoiding confusing the reader with tangential thoughts?. Proper scholarship (citation format): Did you choose a coherent citation style and consistently stick to it? Did you cite readindfpgs that were assigned for the class?