Develop a complete perspectival analysis of the appeal to these concepts.

Even those writers behind our most influential documents in the history of environmental philosophy and resource management sometimes help themselves to undifferentiated and / or undefended concepts of the natural and the artificial.Read and evaluate the so-called Leopold Report of 1963. Show how the Report uses concepts of the natural and the artificial. Develop a complete perspectival analysis of the appeal to these concepts. (see below)After this analysis, offer your own critical assessment: is the Leopold Report defensible in its deployment of these concepts? Explain why, or why not.perspectival analysis:Origin: (1) ​origins​ of a thing. We can ask questions such as: Where did something /process / state come from? Or, what was the original state of a thing / process / state? E.g.Perhaps metals are more natural since they are extracted from nature, and plastics are artificial because they are synthesized in a lab.Inherent Qualities: (2) ​inherent qualities​ of a thing. We can ask questions such as: How is something or process experienced? What does something / process / state feel like? Or, can we describe the sensible qualities of a thing / process / state? E.g. can plastics be said to be more natural because they are more flexible, soft, and more like biological tissue than metals or wood?Process: (3) ​process​ creating something / mode of manufacture of a thing. We can ask questions such as: By means of what kind of process did something / process / state result? E.g.if glass is produced by a process similar to what happens in nature, then is it more natural than plastic?End Product: (4) ​end product​ of a thing. We can ask questions such as: What is the product of something / process / state intended to look like or achieve? How is the end product supposed to function? E.g. is a wood bridge more natural than a metal bridge because it better “fits” into its surroundings?Make sure to begin your paper with an abbreviated analysis of the Leopold Report in terms of its Project, Thesis, and Method. (The ​Thesis identifies the conclusion or a specific “take-home” point of the chapter, article, section, book, etc.The ​project identifies the broader social or intellectual context of the reading. Is the author attempting to change a social or academic “climate” or “mood”? If so, try to articulate this climate or mood? What kind of reader is the author trying to reach with his / her / their Thesis and Method? Who will the author be able to persuade? What is at stake if the author is correct about his / her / their thesis, or if the thesis is accepted by the author’s society? Why should we care?The ​Method requires a statement concerning how the author supplies evidence or “backing” for the thesis.)Leopold Report:Project: The project of this report is a suggestion to add more value to national parks through methods of maintenance.Thesis: The thesis of this report is to convince the secretary of the need for maintenance within national parks in order for parks to exhibit primitive America. “As a primary goal, we would recommend that the biotic associations within each park be maintained, or where necessary recreated, as nearly as possible in the condition that prevailed when the area was first visited by the white man.”Method/Argumentative strategy: Leopold manages to convince the secretary by recommending policy changes, methods of habitat management, and control of animal populations. Leopold breaks down the recommended categories in steps and techniques based on scientific research for approval from the secretary.