Discuss the problem with free speech.

Regarding citations for paraphrased information, it is generally recommended that the citation be placed at the end of the paragraph containing the paraphrased information.And my case summaries are New York V. Sullivan (1964): This case is about a full-page ad alleging the arrest of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. for perjury in Alabama. The fake ad’s intention was to destroy King’s effort to encourage black Americans to vote. Mr. Sullivan, the Montgomery city commissioner, issued a Libel suit against NYT and 4 blacks listed as endorsers of the ad, claiming that the allegations against Montgomery police defamed him personally. This case resulted in the Sullivan rule which says the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. The Constitution restricts the ability of American public officials to sue for “defamation.”Brandenburg V. Ohio (1969): Brandenburg, a leader of Ku Klux Klan was charged for making a speech during their rally which violated the Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating “crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform,” as well as assembling “with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism.” This case resulted in The Brandenburg or Incitement test. This test says “The constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”Texas V. Johnson (1989): throughout the 1984 Republican National Convention, Johnson participated in a very political demonstration to protest the policies of the Reagan administration. Johnson publicity burned American flag while american flag protesters chanted. Johnson was guilty of desecration of a “respected” object in violation of a Lone-Star State statute. A state court of appeals affirmed. However, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reverted, holding that the State could not penalise Johnson for burning the flag in these circumstances.U.S. V. Eichman(1990): Eichman set a flag ablaze on the steps of the U.S. Capitol while protesting the government’s domestic and foreign policy. The court brought the law as a result of “its asserted interest is related to the suppression of free expression and concerned with the content of such expression. Additionally permitting to be burned in a disposal ceremony.Hill V. Colorado(2000): This case came to a decision by the Supreme Court where the Court ruled 6-3 that the First Amendment right to free speech was not violated by a Colorado law limiting protest, education, distribution of literature or counseling within eight feet of a person entering a health-care facility.