In an essay of at least 500 words, break down and critically analyze the rhetorical style/structure of Matthew J.X. Malady’s “Want to Save Civilization? Get in Line” (Links to an external site.) (it is also available as a PDF here).

In an essay of at least 500 words, break down and critically analyze the rhetorical style/structure of Matthew J.X. Malady’s “Want to Save Civilization? Get in Line” (Links to an external site.) (it is also available as a PDF here). Examine such issues as audience (who is Malady’s audience, how does he try to situate and persuade his audience, and why does he employ a certain type of rhetorical style to do so?), use of Aristotelian appeals (what kind of ethos does Malady construct for himself in the essay and why; how does he employ pathos-based and logos-based moves to try to engage the audience?), use of rhetorical moves (what moves does he favor and to what ends?), and essay structure and tone (why does he position material in certain places; what kind of overarching sensibilities/attitudes does he subscribe to throughout and how does he intend the audience to receive these?). You are not required to cover all of these issues; quite frankly, in an essay of 500 words, you would not be able to even if you tried. Limit yourself to one or perhaps two of these categories (if you choose two, make sure that you develop a tight bridge between one and the other, i.e. audience and use of logos; rhetorical moves and ethos; so on), and spend your entire essay critically analyzing the relationship between your analytical focus(es) and the overall rhetorical style/structure of Malady’s essay. Create a controlling idea (thesis) for the entire piece, and controlling ideas (topic sentences) for the body paragraphs. Moreover, include an introduction, at least two body paragraphs of four to five sentences each, and a conclusion. Make certain to develop your ideas with support sentences and specific details (you should cite and comment on material from the Malady’s essay in order to further your analysis).Considerations:Do not write a summary of Malady’s article. I’ve read it; I do not need a summary. Make sure that your essay–from start to finish–is based in analysis of some of the Malady’s rhetoric (see the prompt for possible analytical approaches).Do not craft an essay agreeing or disagreeing with Malady’s position. Whether you like or dislike his contentions is neither here nor there. Focus your analytical attention, instead, on aspects of his rhetoric (again, see the prompt for possible analytical approaches).