What are the reasons Emanuel provides for the values he places on living and life in general appropriate for healthy living in the 21st century?

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/why-i-hope-to-die-at-75/379329/ Micheal Enright, the most of the CBC Radio show the Sunday edition, introduced his guest Dr. Ezekiel J.Emanuel on December 7, 2014 Ezekiel J. Emanuel, at age 57, has an unusual ambition, a hope, really. He wants to die when he is 75. He doesn’t have a terminal illness. And he has no plans to commit suicide. He leads an active, productive life. He recently climbed Mount Kilimanjaro with two nephews. But come 2032, he will, without any fuss, refuse all [medical] tests and treatments. He will allow his body to take its natural course. He is very serious about his intentions. In fact, he argues that 75 is a good age for most of us to die. Dr. Emanuel is one of the most renowned and esteemed physicians in the United States. An oncologist, he is currently the Chair of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania. He has received dozens of awards from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health and the American Cancer Society. The interview followed an article that Emanuel wrote of the Atlantic entitled” Why I hope to Die ar 75″ Enright and most of the people who read this article wanted to know why he chose the age 75 to die.When reading Emanuels article, however, you will notice that he doesnt actually say he wants to die when he is 75. He says that in 2032 he will stop having annual medical check-ups and he will refuse all medical tests and treatments. response paper that compares Ezekiel J. Emanuels justifications for deciding to refuse all medical tests and treatments after reaching 75 with Barry Glassners claim that individuals making independent life-plans concerning their health do so for profoundly social reasons. In his chapter, In the Name of HealthGlassner observes that people decide to alter their appearance not at indiscriminate points intheir lives but most commonly when their social circumstances are changing. Although Glassner is focused on figuring out why people set out to improve their bodies through activities such as bodybuilding, weight loss programs, and cosmetic surgery, he shares with Emanuel an interest on how society imposes certain specific values and consequences for why individuals should improve their bodies (in Glassners case) or make decisions about whether or not they have become a burdens upon family and society (in Emanuels case). Be sure, in your essay, to include answers to the following questions: 1. How does refusing medical tests and treatments pose a threat to Emanuels or anyones health from a biomedical perspective? 2. What are the reasons Emanuel provides for the values he places on living and life in general appropriate for healthy living in the 21st century? 2a. In what ways are the reasons Emanuel provides for the values he places on living life different and similar to the reasons Glassner provides for why people set out to improve their bodies through activities such as bodybuilding, weight loss programs, and cosmetic surgery? 2b. Also consider whether Emanuels and Glassners arguments apply to everyone. Is refusing all medical tests and treatments after reaching age 75 or taking up activities such as bodybuilding, weight loss programs, and cosmetic surgery things that everyone should consider or just some people? (Provide reasons for your answer to this question!) 3 What functions do bodily dys-appearance and eu-appearance play in Emanuels and Glassners arguments?