Write a paper discussing the significance of peer review and its importance to the presidential nominating process.

The paper requires citations in APSA. It should be double-spaced, with standard fonts and margins. Youmust underline your argument (thesis).Paper promptIn chapter seven of her book, Primary Politics, Dr. Elaine Kamarck makes an extended argument foradding back “peer review” of the presidential nominating process. She offers ideas such as unpledgedsuperdelegates and mandatory pre-primary endorsements. This would effectively decrease the impactof the state-by-state primary process, but also put the United States in line with all other western-styledemocracies. When discussing Democratic superdelegates on page 198, Kamarck states “In anincreasingly polarized and paranoid electorate, there is no legitimacy given to leaders of the party eventhough they are elected by the same people,” signaling that it is highly unlikely that the US electoratewould be in favor of strengthening the role of party elites in the presidential nominating process.Make an argument for or against the notion of adding peer review back into the presidential nominatingprocess and how this could be implemented given the mood of the American electorate. Is there a needfor peer review? Explain. Consider the following questions: What problems would peer review solve (ifany)? What idealistic and practical arguments could be made against peer review? Does the invisibleprimary resolve the issue of peer review or does the election of President Trump, a party outsider withno governmental experience, negate the notion of the invisible primary? Given what you have readregarding the party rules and platforms of both parties, how and where should peer review beimplemented?Bottom line: we would like you to write a paper making an argument for or against change in thepresidential nominating process, while answering Kamarck’s argument for peer review. Take a stanceand make an energetic, unique argument focused on your position. You may choose to include someinformation about South Carolina’s role in the process, but your answer should be focused on thenational level and the rules governing the process of nominating presidential candidates.Key pointsThis paper requires that you make an argument. An argument in this case means something new, notsomething obvious, or something that our authors already told us. Please make an argument aboutsomething you read (perhaps in Kamarck or Knotts & Ragusa) related to the paper prompt.**You will move into A or B range if your argument is something new and risky. Something that has notbeen said or written about before, that you can back up with evidence from our readings or from othersources.book sources to use:Primary Politics, Dr. Elaine KamarckFIRST IN THE SOUTH: Why South Carolina’s Presidential Primary Mattersby H. Gibbs Knotts (Author), Jordan M. Ragusa (Author)web sources:https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/why-iowa-and-new-hampshire-go-firstEffects on Democratic Choice”Other resources not on Blackboard:https://frontloading.blogspot.com/https://www.brookings.edu/author/elaine-kamarck/https://www.brookings.edu/author/elaine-kamarck/?type=research