Develop your own philosophical position on what constitutes appropriate parameters of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and support it with logical arguments and specific examples.
June 9, 2020 Comments Off on Develop your own philosophical position on what constitutes appropriate parameters of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and support it with logical arguments and specific examples. Uncategorized Assignment-help

Write an essay on one topic from each section below. Indicate the number of each topic you have chosen. Write your two essays in a single document (one right after the other). If you quote and/or paraphrase, include a separate Works Cited section at the end of each essay. Where do your individual rights end and others’ rights begin? One’s view of what is an acceptable framework for liberty and the pursuit of happiness (and what is not) is likely to be based in part on his/her moral/ethical positions and political conditioning. Develop your own philosophical position on what constitutes appropriate parameters of individual liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and support it with logical arguments and specific examples.Second Topic 2. There is a court case that potentially involves two elements of the First Amendment: freedom of religion and free political speech. It could also involve civil rights issues included in the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection clause in the 14th Amendment. The case involves a Christian printer who refused to print gay pride T-shirts on religious grounds. The printer declined the printing job for T-shirts promoting a gay pride festival but offered to contact other local printers to do the work for the same price. The printer had a history of rejecting other orders for shirts promoting sexually explicit material/actions and violence. Do an analysis of this case by considering possible arguments on both sides, and then reach a conclusion as to whether the Supreme Court should rule for or against the printer and how you think the Court would rule if the case comes before them.