Did the analysis leave room for change or were parameters clearly defined so that the rule is limited in application?

Directions
The students are expected to summarize the facts of the case (what happened that led to the lawsuit and how it progressed through the courts) and prepare a case brief using the IRAC method. IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, and Conclusion) is an acronym for a method for summarizing legal opinions.
• “Issue” is the question or problem that the court was addressing (this should be in a form of a question).
• “Rule” is the rule or legal principle announced by the court’s holding.
• “Analysis” is a brief summary of the court’s reasoning behind the ruling. This may include references to particular laws, policy implications, or other court cases.
• “Conclusion” addresses the applicability of the holding to similar cases.
1. Did the court limit the holding to certain facts or situations?
2. Did the analysis leave room for change or were parameters clearly defined so that the rule is limited in application?
Carefully read Goodman v. United States, 298 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2002), an informed consent case, in which Goodman’s wife JoAnn, diagnosed with incurable melanoma, participated in a clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health and died from a toxic reaction to one of the medicines used in the study.
See link below for Goodman v. United States, 298 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2002) case
http://openjurist.org/298/f3d/1048/goodman-v-united-states

Use 3 References that are 5 years old or less.