Discuss and explain the meaning and importance of your findings and analysis as they relate to HUS.

Produce a 1800-2000 word, APA style research paper titled: “Policy Website Evaluation: Implications for HUS Service Workers.” The paper should analyze 4 websites that focus on a policy issue of relevance to HUS service workers (e.g., mental health, education, poverty, drugs, etc.). Each website will be described and assessed in detail using the CRAAP method for evaluating websites, and then will be ranked in terms of usefulness to HUS workers. Use the attached worksheet Worksheet_WebEval.pdf to evaluate and score the sites. You do NOT need to submit this form, but you may reference the scores in your paper.Formatting and Organizational GuidelinesUse APA style for this project. The American Psychological Association has a step by step tutorial on APA style.Use APA style for this project. This will include:Title page and running header. Use the title shown above.Times Roman 12 font.Double spacing only throughout.Abstract page (separate from title page and body of the paper).Headings throughout to break up the content. Use the headings listed below, or something very similar.In-text citations and a references pageThe introduction will set-up the problem—unreliable information on the internet; yet, HUS workers are expected to provide reliable, evidence based information and services to clients.The introduction will identify the website evaluation tool (CRAAP) and briefly explain why it will be used to assess the websites.The introduction will identify the policy area and briefly justify the choice based on relevance to HUS. This will require additional research to determine areas of competency for HUS professionals. One source is the National Organization for Human Services; two additional, reliable sources are needed as well.The introduction concludes by describing how the rest of the paper will be structured.The Policy and its Relevance to HUS, will discuss the chosen policy area in more depth; identify key policies, laws, etc. The text can be used as one source; a minimum of two other scholarly (non-commercial) sources must be used as well.The website name – each section devoted to analyzing a website should explicitly follow the CRAAP method; pay careful attention to the credentials of authors and how sources are cited. Are the citations in-text and in a references section? Take care NOT to list.The ranking will provide an overview of the results and offer a ranking of the websites based on the CRAAP method. It is possible that you may have a tie—if so, you will need to explain why this is the case.The discussion will discuss and explain the meaning and importance of your findings and analysis as they relate to HUS.The conclusion will restate the purpose of the paper, describe the strategy, describe the findings and their importance to HUS.