Discuss Ethics in Psychology.

IntroductionYou have been assigned the task of sitting on an Institutional review board (IRB) to consider the approval or rejection of a research proposal that involves ethical issues. Before reading the proposal, review Are You Thinking About Being in a Research StudyPreview the document. After your review, read the proposal and answer the questions below.ProposalTyrone wants to study the impact of watching sexually suggestive/explicit television on people’s attitudes toward sex. He plans to test ninth graders because he believes they are still young enough to be highly impressionable. He will solicit volunteers to come after school. Half will be assigned to watch one hour of sexually explicit clips from a cable TV show while the other half will view an hour of clips from the same show that deal with nonsexual topics. After watching the TV shows, all participants will fill out a questionnaire about the attitudes toward sex.Answer the following questions:What additional information might you want to know about the study in order to decide whether or not it should be approved?What are the benefits that might result from this research? What are the potential harms?As a member of the IRB review committee, would you approve this proposal? Why or why not?This assignment is adopted from Allyson J. Weseley, EdD Roslyn High School, Roslyn Heights, NYInclude an in-text citation (APA format) from the textbook or a peer-reviewed source to support your conclusions.Any content that is paraphrased, summarized, or quoted must be cited using APA format. For more information on APA format, review the OWL Guide: APA General FormatChapter Objective: Students will demonstrate an understanding of investigative techniques used by psychologists, and evaluate their relative strengths and limitations (C1).RubricAssignment Rubric (30)Assignment Rubric (30)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and idea development15.0 ptsExcellent: Well-developed ideas that are reflective, substantive, and factual.13.0 ptsGood: Some development of ideas, include some reflection and thought.9.0 ptsAcceptable: Basic ideas; lacks reflection and is not substantive.0.0 ptsUnacceptable: non-performance or ideas unclear; lacks substance, and irrelevant.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking10.0 ptsExcellent: Displays an excellent understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts. Correct use of psychology terminology. Post integrates outside references or relevant research to support important points. Well-edited and cited appropriately.9.0 ptsGood: Displays some understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts. Some use of psychology terminology. Minimal outside references or relevant research to support important points. Some editing and citations.5.0 ptsAcceptable: Repeats and summarizes readings only. Psychology terminology, references, and research lacking.0.0 ptsUnacceptable: Non-performance or is unclear, irrelevant, or off-topic.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity/Writing Mechanics5.0 ptsExcellent: Writing is clear, concise, and easy to read. Free of spelling or grammatical errors. Format includes introduction, body, and conclusion and transitions smoothly between paragraphs.4.0 ptsGood: Writing concise with minimal spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is organized and includes introduction, body and conclusion, lacks smooth transitions between paragraphs.3.0 ptsAcceptable: Writing contains spelling and grammatical errors. Writing is unorganized, lacking introduction, body, and conclusion. No transitions between paragraphs.0.0 ptsUnacceptable: Non-performance or major errors in spelling, grammar, and sentence structure.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 30.0