Draw a distinction between the special, technical sense of a term (e.g., “substance” as a philosophical term) and the everyday sense of that same term.

2. Your critical response should be edited and proofread to ensure that it is written in clear, complete, grammatical English. 3. Your critical response must be your own work, and you must adhere to the standards of academic integrity. 4. The title and the author of the text to which you are responding must appear in the first sentence of your response. 5. You may not repeat a discussion move (that is, you must complete a total of 6 different moves over the course of the semester) Requirements for this Discussion Move: Distinctions help authors communicate with their readers by (a) safeguarding against common confusions or objections, (b) naming competing positions for purposes of comparison or contrast, and/or (c) helping to narrow focus so that the specific target of an argument is clear. You may complete this discussion move by furthering any of those goals. As an example of (a), you might want to draw a distinction between the special, technical sense of a term (e.g., “substance” as a philosophical term) and the everyday sense of that same term. As an example of (b), you might want to name and briefly define two opposing positions in order to show how they are different from one another (e.g., consequentialism vs. deontology in ethics). As an example of (c), you might want to zero in on how a specific writer uses a technical or specialized term (e.g., many philosophers broadly subscribe to “materialist,” positions, but when we describe Marx as “materialist,” we specifically mean … X”).