Each assignment from 1 to 4 should be about 140 words not less than 135 words……each readings attach is associate with each assignments ……Compare and contrast them using the following questions:How do the 1924 and 1965 immigration laws address race? How does the 1965 improve upon the 1924 law?

Assignment #1After reading the Okrent article and the fact sheet on the 1965 Immigration Act, create a thread and respond to the following prompt.. Compare and contrast them using the following questions:How do the 1924 and 1965 immigration laws address race? How does the 1965 improve upon the 1924 law? How does it fall short? How did the 1924 and 1965 acts impact immigrant groups? Be sure to discuss at least one group for each law. Assignment #2After reading the Macías-Rojas article create a thread and respond to the following prompt.How does a criminal status complicate an immigrant’s legal status?How do ideas about criminality influence who Americans see as desirable potential citizens?Assignment #3After reading the Aptekar (both) and Felix articles, article create a thread and respond to the following prompt.How does does the naturalization of immigrants confirm the view of the United States as a nation of immigrants? How does the naturalization process or in other words, the bureaucratic details of becoming a citizen (the filing of paperwork etc.) introduce inequality and discrimination? Assignment #4After reading the Longo article create a thread and respond to the following prompt.What are some of the gender norms that Longo identifies in her research? Do these norms reflect the lives of native born Americans? How might these gender norms pose a problem for immigrants? Think about cultural differences and practices around marriage and family. Should we use gender norms in this way? Why or why not?https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/fifty-years-1965-immigration-and-nationality-act-continues-reshape-united-states