Evaluate the author’s sources for currency, credibility, and relevance.

Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 3 and pp. 94-107, 295-297, and 306, 337-356LessonMinimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)Apply the following writing resources to your assignment:Part 1: Research & ReviewWith your specific argument stance (thesis/claim) in mind, locate one scholarly source with opinions that do not agree with your own stance. Using Toulmin’s model, demonstrate source evaluation and the use of concession and refutation to rebut an opposing viewpoint, keeping in mind the importance of a humble yet assertive tone.First, in 1-2 rich paragraphs, examine the author’s application of the Toulmin Model. First, note your source’s author, title, and year, and answer all of the following as related to the author’s use of argument:Claim: What is the article’s main point and purpose? Who is the author’s audience?Grounds: Provide at least one example of support the author uses for this claim. Be sure to use proper quotation or paraphrasing methods with correct APA in-text citation.Warrants: How does the author successfully connect this evidence to the article’s main point?Backing: Evaluate the author’s sources for currency, credibility, and relevance.Qualifiers: Note some specific absolutes (all, every, each) and some specific limiters (some, several, many) in the author’s stance and points. How do they add or subtract from the argument?Then in 1-2 rich paragraphs, also in your main post, answer the following as related to your stance for your argument essay:Locate a specific opposing point within the article: Note one point in this article that opposes your stance, using proper source integration and citation techniques.Concession: Although the point is in opposition to your own stance, describe the merits of the point. What elements of the point do you see as valid? Who in your own audience might agree with this opposing source and why?Refutation: Although you are able to find merits to the point and to see that some readers may agree with this opposing viewpoint, how will you refute the point? What might you say and do to convince readers that despite holding some merit, the viewpoint is not as valid or useful as your own stance on the issue? How will your approach to this opposing viewpoint influence your audience’s reaction to your essay?