Explain a criticism of the theory, and defend the theory against that criticism.

Here is exactly what the professor wants: You will see that I must submit an outline first and then the paper. We must be able to do that the week before the paper is due The assigned topic is: Select an ethical theory (Cultural Relativism, Utilitarianism, Divine Command Theory, Kant’s Ethics, Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, Rand’s Ethical Egoism). Explain a criticism of the theory, and defend the theory against that criticism. Or, develop your own criticism of the theory. I want you to develop one of your own ideas to be the claim, the thesis of the paper. Focus your effort on developing a defense of this thesis. (For example, your thesis could be: The criticism that Utilitarianism is impossible to do is unsuccessful in arguing against Utilitarianism. Then you would spend the paper explaining your reasons why it is an unsuccessful criticism.) Your paper will probably need to include an explanation of some philosophy, in addition to the defense of your thesis. For example, maybe your claim is about a new criticism of Utilitarianism. Before you can explain your new solution, you’ll need to explain what Utilitarianism is. Then, every part of the problem or argument must be explained, with examples. You must explain how it all fits together to make a problem or argument. The explanation of the philosophy must be done slowly and clearly, so that every part is included. On the other hand, this is primarily an argument paper–don’t forget that your focus is on developing and defending your own thesis. So, only discuss the philosophy that is necessary to explaining your thesis. If you’re writing a thesis explaining why you think Utilitarianism is right to insist on impartiality, you don’t have to include a discussion of how Utilitarianism focuses on consequences.