For our purposes, that is, for the purposes of considering what it means to live well, do you think the fact that Singer does or does not follow the Obligation to Assist affect the persuasiveness of his argument? Explain.

Home  ›  Uncategorized  ›  For our purposes, that is, for the purposes of considering what it means to live well, do you think the fact that Singer does or does not follow the Obligation to Assist affect the persuasiveness of his argument? Explain.
For our purposes, that is, for the purposes of considering what it means to live well, do you think the fact that Singer does or does not follow the Obligation to Assist affect the persuasiveness of his argument? Explain.
October 29, 2020 Comments Off on For our purposes, that is, for the purposes of considering what it means to live well, do you think the fact that Singer does or does not follow the Obligation to Assist affect the persuasiveness of his argument? Explain. Uncategorized Assignment-help
Words: 111
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Whenever I teach this lesson, students typically ask if Peter Singer “practices what he preaches,” that is, if he abides by the “Obligation to Assist” he so adamantly defends in the text. For our purposes, that is, for the purposes of considering what it means to live well, do you think the fact that Singer does or does not follow the Obligation to Assist affect the persuasiveness of his argument? Explain. (Minimum word count: 200 words)

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/14LqAjSRpBX9oXSQM6DUPwsGYzw6vaPIVi1ignVa0X_U/edit#slide=id.g9ee545f06b_0_48

Read Rich and poor by Peter Singer
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/9990/1/Singer_RichPoor1993.pdf