“Given that the constitutional language on presidential authority has not changed since 1787, while the nature of the job has changed so dramatically, is it time to consider revising the language in Article II?”
June 9, 2020 Comments Off on “Given that the constitutional language on presidential authority has not changed since 1787, while the nature of the job has changed so dramatically, is it time to consider revising the language in Article II?” Uncategorized Assignment-help

“Given that the constitutional language on presidential authority has not changed since 1787, while the nature of the job has changed so dramatically, is it time to consider revising the language in Article II?” You can argue both sides of this, either for a stronger or weaker presidency. This post should be about 300 words. Use examples from the reading to back up your opinions.1. Sidney Milkis and Michael Nelson, The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776-2018, 8th edition, (Washington, DC: Sage/CQ Press, 2020), 455-580. [PDF 2. James Pfiffner, The Modern Presidency, 6th edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, pp. 6-17 [PDF ]3. Read Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the U.S. Constitution, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution4. Ezra Klein, “The Green Lantern Theory of the Presidency, Explained,” Vox, May 20, 2014, https://www.vox.com/2014/5/20/5732208/the-green-lantern-theory-of-the-presidency-explained