Is “Global Citizenship” the best way forward in the 21st century?

DEBATE: Is “global citizenship” the best way forward in the 21st century? Take a stand. Write a 800-900 word essay for or against “Global Citizenship” 1.Define “global citizenship” using one or more of the following: A. Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” B. UN Declaration of Human Rights C. Earth Charter / Singer / Leopold D. “Sustainable Development” E. MacGregor’s Procedural Definition 2.Use one global problem throughout your paper to make your case, e.g. population, war, climate change, poverty, pandemic etc. Draw support for your grasp of the problem from at least one film assigned in the course. 3.Criterion for Argument: Which values will be most likely to help solve the problem you have designated (in 2 above). In other words, which values are best? 4.Briefly distinguish for & against positions according the values in conflict. 5.State your position/thesis/conclusion. (Last sentence of intro paragraph) 6.Make at least one argument for your position drawing support from at least one of the arguments in the course readings. 7.Make at least one argument against your opposition’s best argument. You must select your opposition’s argument from course readings. EXAMPLES of definitions for the paper: ROBUST: “For the purposes of this paper, “global citizenship” means standing as one for the values of respect and caring for life on earth, including ecological integrity, justice, democracy and peace.” MINIMAL: