ithin the context of the arguments presented in the Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case, and the National Rifle Association President James Porter’s article, do you think the U.S. Constitution needs to be amended to provide for an affirmative-duty-to-protect citizens? Explain your position and discuss the consequences that may arise from a change.

ithin the context of the arguments presented in the Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case, and the National Rifle Association President James Porter’s article, do you think the U.S. Constitution needs to be amended to provide for an affirmative-duty-to-protect citizens? Explain your position and discuss the consequences that may arise from a change.
June 4, 2020 Comments Off on ithin the context of the arguments presented in the Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case, and the National Rifle Association President James Porter’s article, do you think the U.S. Constitution needs to be amended to provide for an affirmative-duty-to-protect citizens? Explain your position and discuss the consequences that may arise from a change. Uncategorized Assignment-help
Words: 74
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

For this discussion, study the following:Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case in the textbookhttps://dailycaller.com/2013/10/23/nra-president-james-porter-on-the-job-of-police-no-duty-to-protect/Then respond to the following:Within the context of the arguments presented in the Pinder v. Johnson ( 1995) case, and the National Rifle Association President James Porter’s article, do you think the U.S. Constitution needs to be amended to provide for an affirmative-duty-to-protect citizens? Explain your position and discuss the consequences that may arise from a change.