What were the actions of the supervisor and coworkers that could be considered as racial harassment?

What were the actions of the supervisor and coworkers that could be considered as racial harassment?
May 19, 2020 Comments Off on What were the actions of the supervisor and coworkers that could be considered as racial harassment? Uncategorized Assignment-help
Words: 477
Pages: 2
Subject: Uncategorized

Religious Discrimination and Racial Harassment:What Ever Happened to MarShawn DeMur?Instructions: Please open the attachment and read the SHRM case study. Respond to the five (5) questions identified below (not those in the attached case study but the ones designed for our HRMN 408 class outlined in these instructions). Be specific in your responses and each response should include at least two classroom resources. Do not combine the discussion questions as the use of the outline will help you organize your research and comments and ensure you do not miss any questions that must be addressed. Your responses to each question must be in narrative format not bullets. Action:Please open the attachment and read the case study. Respond to the 5 questions below. You should include at least two classroom resources for each response.You must answer the questions below and NOT the ones in the pdf case study which is attached below.Do not combine the discussion questions and please use the outline below for your paper. Use of the outline will help you organize your research and comments and ensure you do not miss any questions that must be addressed. Your responses to each question must be in narrative format not bullets. Must use the underlined headings below as separate headings in you paper. Failure to follow these instructions will result in a penalty of -1pt.1. Relevant Facts and Specific Law. Maalick was not promoted. Does Maalick have a prima facie religious discrimination case? To support your conclusion, you must discuss in detail the specific criteria for a prime facie religious discrimination case and then the specific facts from the scenario that support each specific criteria, to support whether or not Maalick has a viable religious discrimination case or not. Be specific. 2. Religious Accommodation. Are there any facts to support the contention that Maalick was not given accommodations due to his religious beliefs? Be specific.3. Discuss para a. and b. separately. a. HR Director’s Actions. Characterize the actions of the HR director in response to the overall situation between Maalick, the supervisor and coworkers. Be specific. b. Prevention and Proactive Actions by HR Director. [Discuss sub para 1 and 2 below separately] 1.What could the HR Director have done to prevent this situation and 2. What more could she do to ensure that this type of situation would not occur in the future? Be specific.4. Acts of Religious and Racial Harassment [Discuss para a. and b. below separately]. a. What were the actions of the supervisor and coworkers that could be considered as religious harassment? Be specific and also provide the specific statutory language to back up religious harassment. b. What were the actions of the supervisor and coworkers that could be considered as racial harassment? Was Clive Jenkin’s behavior in direct violation of Treton’s EEO and discrimination policies? Why or why not? Be specific.