Write a responding letter of 500-525 words to the politician briefly explaining how you think the museum’s exhibit should represent the period.

So far so good. The exhibit on evolution opened up promptly without too many issues, though it continues to rouse public interest now and then.Now the museum is moving on to some more modern developments, particularly since World War II. This was a golden age for science in the United States, and some scientists and politicians recognize that. Recently, a Congressman from Florida, partially representing the Space Coast, has written a letter to the museum asking that its exhibits highlight the greatness of American science during the Cold War. “This was truly a bright spot for science in this country, with the space race capturing imaginations and science dedicated to bettering our society,” he says. “I hope the museum rightly celebrates American accomplishments during this period.” Clearly, he wants the exhibit to be somewhat patriotic and commemorative, but you do know more about what actually happened. Was it all rosy and socially beneficial? Or are there other parts of World War II and Cold War that the museum should expose? Basically, why was the Cold War more ambiguous than he suggests for science?Write a responding letter of 500-525 words to the politician briefly explaining how you think the museum’s exhibit should represent the period. What is this Congressman missing from their story of the Cold War?