Write a two-page paper discussing and analysing a primary source. Two documents: a 1950s-era dorm memo for San Angelo College’s Carr Hall women’s dormitory and “Dress for All Occasions.”

Write a two-page paper discussing and analysing a primary source. Two documents: a 1950s-era dorm memo for San Angelo College’s Carr Hall women’s dormitory and “Dress for All Occasions.”
November 19, 2023 Comments Off on Write a two-page paper discussing and analysing a primary source. Two documents: a 1950s-era dorm memo for San Angelo College’s Carr Hall women’s dormitory and “Dress for All Occasions.” best service Assignment-help
Words: 274
Pages: 1
Subject: best service

Write a two-page paper discussing and analysing a primary source. Two documents: a 1950s-era dorm memo for San Angelo College’s Carr Hall women’s dormitory and “Dress for All Occasions.”These documents provide rules for the wearing of shorts and a chart for helping female students decide on a wardrobe for various situations Formatting: Clearly identify your selected primary source (title and author, if applicable) at the top of the paper. Use double-spacing, Times New Roman font size 12, and 1” margins for this paper. Your paper needs to be at least 2 pages double-spaced (approximately 600 words) and no longer than 4 pages. You do not need a Works Cited page. You do not need a title page or paper heading. Use paragraphs to organize writing. Each paragraph should focus on one idea or topic and be supported with evidence (details and discussion of the source). answer the following: Who might have created/ written this source? If you don’t know for sure, make an educated guess. What types of bias might the author of this source have possessed? (Think of bias as “perspective” or “point-of-view.” Every sourcehas at least one type of bias you can comment upon.) Who was the intended audience/ user of this source? How might the intended audience/ user of this source have influenced how the author created this source? Summarize the content of the source. What does the author of the source value, emphasize, or think is important? Why might this source be important or significant in history? Would people today look at the primary source differently than the people who actually used this source? Why or why not?

Tags