Write an Article Review Exercise Hide Assignment Information Turnitin.

Write an Article Review Exercise Hide Assignment Information Turnitin. This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. Week 4 Assignment For this assignment, you will choose a scholarly article pertinent to your research topic and write a review of it. You will “de-construct” the article for the reader, analyzing the claims that the author is making and how well he/she supports those claims. You will also explain how this article fits into your research strategy to answer your research question. Does it provide some insights but still leave you wondering? Technical Requirements Your paper must be at a minimum of 2-3 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit). Scholarly and credible references must be used. A good rule of thumb is to provide at least 1 reference to support each of your main points, and 2 references for support is even better (especially if they come from different credible sources, to help avoid/counter the impact of bias in your own own!). Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space. Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework. Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc. All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric (see below). Professors Guidance for Success on the Week 4 Writing Assignment This week you will choose an article pertinent to your research topic and write a critical review of it to determine its credibility. You will not be re-writing it; rather, you will “de-construct” the article for the reader, analyzing the claims that the author makes and how well s/he supports those claims using logic and supporting evidence. You will also explain how this article fits into your research strategy to answer your research question and your thinking on the topic. Be certain to identify explicitly the specific claims the author makes. Next, assess how well the author makes the claims you have identified. This includes assessing both how the author makes use of facts (i.e., evidence) and reasoning (i.e., logic) to support his/her claims and also a critical assessment of the credibility of the sources the author cites and upon which the author bases his/her claims. Did the author draw his/her evidence from credible sources, and did s/he make good use of the evidence? An author must do both well to be effective, and learning how to determine if an author accomplished these dual objectives is an essential component of becoming an effective researcher and writer! Once you have addressed the claims and sources used for support, turn your attention to how the article relates to your own work by stating specifically how the article fits into your research strategy. Conclude your review of the article by stating whether the article helped you in developing an answer to your research question (it is okay if it did not), and letting the reader know if you gained any specific insight(s) from it and/or if it left you wondering about other aspects of your topic, or both (as long as you address both of these aspects, you will be okay). Use the components of the grading rubric as your subheadings to ensure that you address each aspect of the assignment. Week 4 Writing Assignment Grading Rubric Here is the grading rubric I will use to evaluate the Week 4 writing assignment: What claims does the author make? (Identify the author’s claims specifically) (20 pts) How well are the claims supported by both facts (i.e., evidence) from credible sources and reasoning (logic) that makes sense? (Need to address both how the author makes use of facts and reasoning to support his/her claims and also perform a critical assessment of the credibility of the sources used by the author to support his/her claims) (20 pts) How does the article fit into your research strategy? (Be specific and explicit) (20 pts) Does the article support you in developing an answer about your research question? (Be specific and explict, and it’s okay if it doesn’t) (20 pts) Did you gain insight? Leave you wondering? Or both? (Answer the questions directly and be honest; no “right answer” here either) (20 pts) The rubric is clear about the expectations for this assignment, and I will grade your paper according to each aspect of the rubric. As long as you address each aspect of the rubric directly and sufficiently, you should do well on this assignment. Help me help you by doing so! Hide Rubrics Rubric Name: SSGS Assignment Rubric 300-400 Level Print Criteria Exemplary 20 points Accomplished 15 points Developing 10 points Beginning 5 points Criterion Score Focus/Thesis Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements. Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment. Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment. Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Score of Focus/Thesis, / 20 Content/Subject Knowledge Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence. Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge. The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. There are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area. Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas. Score of Content/Subject Knowledge, / 20 Critical Thinking Skills Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for 300-400 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment. Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with two or fewer errors. Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner. Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills. Score of Critical Thinking Skills, / 20 Organization of Ideas/Format Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student uses required number of academic sources or beyond. Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains number of academic sources required in assignment. Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses fewer sources or references than required by assignment. Academic sources are lacking. Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student’s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. Score of Organization of Ideas/Format, / 20 Writing Conventions Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. Presents a thorough and extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well-planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare a high-quality academic assignment. Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than three-five errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements. Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than five errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student needs to review and revise assignment. Score of Writing Conventions, / 20 Total