Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and correlation?Provide an example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation.

Respond to Julissa’s Post. Respond in first person. If I disagree with someone’s post, I would not only state that I disagree I would also provide a counter claim to show evidence form a credible source as a way to bolster and explain my disagreement. Always keep in mind that since there is no tone in a post, the best way to disagree is to provide a counter argument in a polite and academic manner along with a citation from a credible source. Remember to add to the conversation. Remember to cite your work that is how a critical thinker shows evidence. At least one paragraph with one source and APA.Julissa’s post:Why is it a fallacy to confuse causation and correlation?Correlation and causality can cause some confusion being that they can exist at the same time, although correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation (Moore & Parker, 2017). Causation applies to instances where one action or thing causes the outcome of another. While correlation can be defined as the relationship between two or more things. A fallacy occurs when a causal connection is assumed without a proof (Texas State University, n.d). A questionable-cause logical fallacy is an idea that correlation implies causation (Texas State University, n.d).Provide an example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation.An example of a statement that confuses causation with correlation would be that the final exam always lands on the days I work. The chances of an exam day falling on the same day I have to work do not correlate with reality. References:Moore, B,N., Parker, R. (2017) “Critical Thinking”. Boston, MA. McGraw-Hill. Texas State University. (n.d.). Questionable Cause. Retrieved from https://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/resources/fallacy-definitions/Questionable-Cause.html