What should the U.S. Supreme Court hold on the constitutionality of the statute and why?

 Peter Pan, the Lost Boys, Wendy, John, Michael, and Captain Hook are  some of the residents of the State of Neverland.  Hook along with  several other adults have purchased various video games for themselves  or their children.  Some of these games contain violent material.  The  State of Neverland passed a law that prohibited the sale or rental of  “violent video games.” The act defined violent video games as games “in  which the range of options available to a player includes killing,  maiming, dismembering, or sexually assaulting an image of a human being,  if those acts are depicted” in a manner that “[a] reasonable person,  considering the game as a whole, would find appeals to a deviant or  morbid interest of minors.” The association of video game manufacturers  and developers brought suit, challenging the Neverland’s statute as an  unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment right and a violation  of their due process rights because it is so vague. What should the U.S.  Supreme Court hold on the constitutionality of the statute and why?